Showing posts with label based on classics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label based on classics. Show all posts

Friday, January 14, 2011

January 7, 2011 post

Normally I love a good snowstorm - so peaceful and pretty! Plus, I don't drive/park, and Boston's d**m good at keeping up with snow removal, which helps. Tonight, however, since NY and CT apparently can NOT handle snow, my dear friend S has been stuck on a bus from NYC for hours (I think we're approaching 7, as I type this), and may never make it to Boston - last update, they were still in CT, and the bus driver has taken to walking up and down the aisle of the bus, cursing the CT governor...because why sit behind the wheel when you're at a dead stop, I suppose...

So, to kill some time, and kill the pile of books by my bed, here's what I've been plowing through (no pun intended) recently:

Emma Brown by Clare Boylan, based on an unfinished (20 pages, I think?) manuscript by Charlotte Bronte {how do I do accents in this thing?}. Entertaining, but nothing super special. It was a little hard to really sink into the story because it seemed so anachronistic - I'm using that word wrong, but I can't think of a better way to say it at the moment; basically, there are a lot of references to sex, prostitution, child exploitation, etc. They're handled well, and more or less subtly, but they're still more present than they would have been if the book were really written in Bronte's time. Boylan's handle on the language - words, structure - is nice, though. I had read this before (it's one of the ones I took from home to try and sell), but I didn't remember it at all, so it was like reading it for the first time, so that was good! Forget now exactly when I read it (this time), but I think it was the day before and day of New Year's Eve, and maybe after.
Definitely read What Remains of Heaven, the 5th (?) Sebastian St. Cyr mystery by C. S. Harris on the second of January. Was out until 10 a.m. on the first, then came home and pretty much passed out for the rest of the day, so I can't remember if I started the book on the first or not. But I definitely read it when I was recuperating on the second, and it was perfect for that! The new heroine is really growing on me; I like her, and the hero with her, SO much better than the last one. I think I might be all caught up with the series now, which is actually making me kind of sad; considering at first I would only read the books if I could get them from the library or used & cheap, and if I were really bored, that's saying something. AH - the next is due out March 1, 2011, apparently. Good to know.
Next came yet another Tracy Chevalier book (I have GOT to be caught up on these by now - but d*mn, that woman is prolific!) - this one, The Lady and the Unicorn, like Girl with a Pearl Earring, is inspired by a piece of art, in this case the Lady and the Unicorn tapestries. I really liked this book - totally different from the last Chevalier I read (I picked it up at the same time, because I liked the cover [the tapestries], but had no idea what it was about, although I kind of guessed from the title), about the fossil hunter, but it was engaging and interesting. It made me want to go learn more about the time and skills, as well as the people, described in the book, which is always a good thing. The chapters switching back and forth between several different character points of view could have been distracting, or interrupt the flow of the narrative, but it didn't. One issue I did have, though, and it's one I have with a lot of books set in the Middle Ages (late 1400s is the Middle Ages, right?): I hate when the liturgical season is used instead of normal dates. I mean, maybe I should just learn it, to be a more generally well-educated and -read person or something, but while Easter is a useful reference point for me, or Lent, "Septuagesima" means nothing to me...
A couple hundred years later a band of misfit, enraging and endearing players were wandering Italy and France in Francine Prose' The Glorious Ones. A quick, easy read with familiar nods to lots of classics, Dante most prominently, I had fun with it, but it didn't make much of an impression. I think I am just not really a short story kind of person, and I thought the links between these stories/chapters were too tenuous for my tastes, but there is no denying Prose does a masterful job with the writing here. The voices were distinct and evocative, and she suggests a vital setting without painting it in too much detail.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

more Regency mystery...

Finally read the second Tracy Grant mystery, Beneath a Silent Moon, starring Charles and Melanie Fraser.  I think I preferred the first book, but I don't really remember it all that well.  This one got a bit convoluted, and I, for one, have some problems sometimes with British books, particularly the Regency-era ones, because I get confused by the names - everyone has a first name, a last name, a title...  It was fun enough, though, and good for a cold, snowy day when I stayed home and mostly just slept and ate stew.  Not sure what is next on the list - strangely, I got NO books for Christmas, which has to be a first.  Of course, I have literally shelves-full of books I've bought and books I've borrowed from the library, but nothing's jumping out at me.  Which is maybe a good thing, since I REALLY need to clean my apartment today, rather than just sleep and read and eat...like, yesterday.  It was magical, but time to get back to real life.


Oh - and was just picking up and found A Vengeful Longing, by R.N. Morris, on the coffee table, under a pile of magazines and other books (including Dick Minear's latest offering!!!) - I think I read it at the same time as the Chevalier book? Don't really remember now, but I think I finished it and then moved on to Perdido Street.  In any case, I really enjoyed it.  It's the second, I believe, in the "St. Petersburg Mystery" series, starring Dostoyevsky's detective from Crime and Punishment (so freaking amazing), Porfiry Petrovich.  I remember I saw it on the outside bargain table at the Harvard Bookstore, and almost grabbed it, but then remembered I should really be spending my money on Christmas presents, so I held off until I could check Hollis, and sure enough, the library had it.  I'm wondering now if they didn't have the earlier book (A Gentle Axe), because I don't know why I wouldn't have started with that one...
I don't think it mattered all that much, but there were several references to events that happened prior to the opening of the book, and I wasn't sure if they were meant to be a bit mysterious, or if I would have understood them if I had read the first book.  In any case, I thought the writing was great: well-drawn, nuanced characters, that you get to know a little, but also stay at arm's length; wonderfully descriptive settings, with evocative details - the persistent flies buzzing throughout the story's hot, foetid summer were a great touch!